MATHEMATICS (Polysemy in) 2)3)
← Back
In his book "Facts of Science ", V.V. NALIMOV observes that polysemy has now also appeared in the language of mathematics (1981 b, p.75)". He writes that, from Gödel's theorem "it follows that human thinking is richer than its deductive formulation" (Ibid)
This new mathematical polysemy resulted (quite recently) of the use of mathematics "for describing poorly organized, diffuse systems… (as) the requirements placed on mathematical descriptions have become less strict. Whereas the description of real phenomena in mathematical language was earlier regarded as the expression of a law of nature, now it has become possible to speak of mathematical models which may all simultaneously be legitimate"(Ibid)
Nalimov adds, further on, that "this polymorphism of the language of applied mathematics increases its flexibility"(Ibid)
However he feels clearly some qualms about this evolution. He escapes more or less from these by defining mathematical models "as a question to Nature asked by a Researcher" " Matters like computer modelling technique or fuzzy algorithms- of enormous practical usefulness are surely pertaining to this type of "questions asked". Are mathematics turning from deductive to inductive… and even possibly abductive?
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: