ORDER through FIT 1)4)
← Back
G. BROEKSTRA describes this managerial concept as based on "… the notion of fit or internal consistency between core organizational variables" and signals that: "Thus, from the beginning the rationality of equilibium became associated (with it). It was understood that fluctuations in the form of misfits, inconsistencies, paradoxes, or contradictions, had to be dampened or suppressed. In this way, the fit paradigm became a unitary approach driving an organization towards a particular stable attractor state (configuration). However, although a tight fit may lead temporarily to excellence… paradoxically, in the long run, fit may lead to failure" (1993, p.76).
Maintaining stability at any cost may not be the correct response when some internal or external condition basic for such a "stable attractor" is not anymore guaranteed.
BROEKSTRA explains that in this case: "… a new way of thinking about organizing is called for, one that encompasses this paradox. The old fit perspective does not disappear, but is absorbed into a more comprehensive theory" (p.77).
BROEKSTRA proceeds in his paper to the elaboration of such a theory based on the chaos hypothesis of change.
Categories
- 1) General information
- 2) Methodology or model
- 3) Epistemology, ontology and semantics
- 4) Human sciences
- 5) Discipline oriented
Publisher
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science(2020).
To cite this page, please use the following information:
Bertalanffy Center for the Study of Systems Science (2020). Title of the entry. In Charles François (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics (2). Retrieved from www.systemspedia.org/[full/url]
We thank the following partners for making the open access of this volume possible: